Not yours to give...............

This was sent to me by a friend who long ago left the Pittsburgh area because the taxes and the business climate made finding employment much easier in other parts of the United States. With todays short attention spans this is a rather long read but I think it is well worth the effort. I also happen to think that it applies just as much today as it did when it was written. See if you agree.



------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally published in "The Life of Colonel David Crockett," compiled by
Edward Sylvester Ellis (Philadelphia: Porter & Coates, 1884).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Not Yours To Give"
Col. David Crockett
US Representative from Tennessee (1827-1831, 1832-1835)

One day in the House of Representatives a bill was taken up appropriating
money for the benefit of a widow of a distinguished naval officer. Several
beautiful speeches had been made in its support. The speaker was just about
to put the question when Crockett arose:

"Mr. Speaker--I have as much respect for the memory of the deceased, and as
much sympathy for the suffering of the living, if there be, as any man in
this House, but we must not permit our respect for the dead or our sympathy
for part of the living to lead us into an act of injustice to the balance of
the living. I will not go into an argument to prove that Congress has not
the power to appropriate this money as an act of charity. Every member on
this floor knows it.

We have the right as individuals, to give away as much of our own money as
we please in charity; but as members of Congress we have no right to
appropriate a dollar of the public money. Some eloquent appeals have been
made to us upon the ground that it is a debt due the deceased. Mr. Speaker,
the deceased lived long after the close of the war; he was in office to the
day of his death, and I ever heard that the government was in arrears to
him.

"Every man in this House knows it is not a debt. We cannot without the
grossest corruption, appropriate this money as the payment of a debt. We
have not the semblance of authority to appropriate it as charity. Mr.
Speaker, I have said we have the right to give as much money of our own as
we please. I am the poorest man on this floor. I cannot vote for this bill,
but I will give one week's pay to the object, and if every member of
Congress will do the same, it will amount to more than the bill asks."

He took his seat. Nobody replied. The bill was put upon its passage, and,
instead of passing unanimously, as was generally supposed, and as, no doubt,
it would, but for that speech, it received but few votes, and, of course,
was lost.

Later, when asked by a friend why he had opposed the appropriation, Crockett
gave this explanation:

"Several years ago I was one evening standing on the steps of the Capitol
with some members of Congress, when our attention was attracted by a great
light over in Georgetown. It was evidently a large fire. We jumped into a
hack and drove over as fast as we could. In spite of all that could be done,
many houses were burned and many families made houseless, and besides, some
of them had lost all but the clothes they had on. The weather was very cold,
and when I saw so many children suffering, I felt that something ought to be
done for them. The next morning a bill was introduced appropriating $20,000
for their relief. We put aside all other business and rushed it through as
soon as it could be done.

"The next summer, when it began to be time to think about election, I
concluded I would take a scout around among the boys of my district. I had
no opposition there but, as the election was some time off, I did not know
what might turn up. When riding one day in a part of my district in which I
was more of a stranger than any other, I saw a man in a field plowing and
coming toward the road. I gauged my gait so that we should meet as he came
up, I spoke to the man. He replied politely, but as I thought, rather
coldly.

"I began: 'Well friend, I am one of those unfortunate beings called
candidates and---

"Yes I know you; you are Colonel Crockett. I have seen you once before, and
voted for you the last time you were elected. I suppose you are out
electioneering now, but you had better not waste your time or mine, I shall
not vote for you again."

"This was a sockdolger...I begged him tell me what was the matter.

"Well Colonel, it is hardly worthwhile to waste time or words upon it. I do
not see how it can be mended, but you gave a vote last winter which shows
that either you have not capacity to understand the Constitution, or that
you are wanting in the honesty and firmness to be guided by it. In either
case you are not the man to represent me. But I beg your pardon for
expressing it that way. I did not intend to avail myself of the privilege of
the constituent to speak plainly to a candidate for the purpose of insulting
you or wounding you.'

"I intend by it only to say that your understanding of the constitution is
very different from mine; and I will say to you what but for my rudeness, I
should not have said, that I believe you to be honest.

But an understanding of the constitution different from mine I cannot
overlook, because the Constitution, to be worth anything, must be held
sacred, and rigidly observed in all its provisions. The man who wields power
and misinterprets it is the more dangerous the honest he is.'

"'I admit the truth of all you say, but there must be some mistake. Though I
live in the backwoods and seldom go from home, I take the papers from
Washington and read very carefully all the proceedings of Congress. My
papers say you voted for a bill to appropriate $20,000 to some sufferers by
fire in Georgetown. Is that true?

"Well my friend; I may as well own up. You have got me there. But certainly
nobody will complain that a great and rich country like ours should give the
insignificant sum of $20,000 to relieve its suffering women and children,
particularly with a full and overflowing treasury, and I am sure, if you had
been there, you would have done just the same as I did.'

"It is not the amount, Colonel, that I complain of; it is the principle. In
the first place, the government ought to have in the Treasury no more than
enough for its legitimate purposes. But that has nothing with the question.
The power of collecting and disbursing money at pleasure is the most
dangerous power that can be entrusted to man, particularly under our system
of collecting revenue by a tariff, which reaches every man in the country,
no matter how poor he may be, and the poorer he is the more he pays in
proportion to his means.

What is worse, it presses upon him without his knowledge where the weight
centers, for there is not a man in the United States who can ever guess how
much he pays to the government. So you see, that while you are contributing
to relieve one, you are drawing it from thousands who are even worse off
than he.

If you had the right to give anything, the amount was simply a matter of
discretion with you, and you had as much right to give $20,000,000 as
$20,000. If you have the right to give at all; and as the Constitution
neither defines charity nor stipulates the amount, you are at liberty to
give to any and everything which you may believe, or profess to believe, is
a charity and to any amount you may think proper. You will very easily
perceive what a wide door this would open for fraud and corruption and
favoritism, on the one hand, and for robbing the people on the other. 'No,
Colonel, Congress has no right to give charity.'

"'Individual members may give as much of their own money as they please, but
they have no right to touch a dollar of the public money for that purpose.
If twice as many houses had been burned in this country as in Georgetown,
neither you nor any other member of Congress would have Thought of
appropriating a dollar for our relief. There are about two hundred and forty
members of Congress. If they had shown their sympathy for the sufferers by
contributing each one week's pay, it would have made over $13,000. There are
plenty of wealthy men around Washington who could have given $20,000 without
depriving themselves of even a luxury of life.'

"The congressmen chose to keep their own money, which, if reports be true,
some of them spend not very creditably; and the people about Washington, no
doubt, applauded you for relieving them from necessity of giving what was
not yours to give. The people have delegated to Congress, by the
Constitution, the power to do certain things. To do these, it is authorized
to collect and pay moneys, and for nothing else. Everything beyond this is
usurpation, and a violation of the Constitution.'

"'So you see, Colonel, you have violated the Constitution in what I consider
a vital point. It is a precedent fraught with danger to the country, for
when Congress once begins to stretch its power beyond the limits of the
Constitution, there is no limit to it, and no security for the people. I
have no doubt you acted honestly, but that does not make it any better,
except as far as you are personally concerned, and you see that I cannot
vote for you.'

"I tell you I felt streaked. I saw if I should have opposition, and this man
should go to talking and in that district I was a gone fawn-skin. I could
not answer him, and the fact is, I was so fully convinced that he was right,
I did not want to. But I must satisfy him, and I said to him:

"Well, my friend, you hit the nail upon the head when you said I had not
sense enough to understand the Constitution. I intended to be guided by it,
and thought I had studied it fully. I have heard many speeches in Congress
about the powers of Congress, but what you have said here at your plow has
got more hard, sound sense in it than all the fine speeches I ever heard. If
I had ever taken the view of it that you have, I would have put my head into
the fire before I would have given that vote; and if you will forgive me and
vote for me again, if I ever vote for another unconstitutional law I wish I
may be shot.'

"He laughingly replied; 'Yes, Colonel, you have sworn to that once before,
but I will trust you again upon one condition. You are convinced that your
vote was wrong. Your acknowledgment of it will do more good than beating you
for it. If, as you go around the district, you will tell people about this
vote, and that you are satisfied it was wrong, I will not only vote for you,
but will do what I can to keep down opposition, and perhaps, I may exert
some little influence in that way.'

"If I don't, said I, 'I wish I may be shot; and to convince you that I am in
earnest in what I say I will come back this way in a week or ten days, and
if you will get up a gathering of people, I will make a speech to them. Get
up a barbecue, and I will pay for it.'

"No, Colonel, we are not rich people in this section but we have plenty of
provisions to contribute for a barbecue, and some to spare for those who
have none. The push of crops will be over in a few days, and we can then
afford a day for a barbecue. 'This Thursday; I will see to getting it up on
Saturday week. Come to my house on Friday, and we will go together, and I
promise you a very respectable crowd to see and hear you.

"'Well I will be here. But one thing more before I say good-bye. I must know
your name."

"'My name is Bunce.'

"'Not Horatio Bunce?'

"'Yes

"'Well, Mr. Bunce, I never saw you before, though you say you have seen me,
but I know you very well. I am glad I have met you, and very proud that I
may hope to have you for my friend.'

"It was one of the luckiest hits of my life that I met him. He mingled but
little with the public, but was widely known for his remarkable
intelligence, and for a heart brim-full and running over with kindness and
benevolence, which showed themselves not only in words but in acts. He was
the oracle of the whole country around him, and his fame had extended far
beyond the circle of his immediate acquaintance. Though I had never met him,
before, I had heard much of him, and but for this meeting it is very likely
I should have had opposition, and had been beaten. One thing is very
certain, no man could now stand up in that district under such a vote.

"At the appointed time I was at his house, having told our conversation to
every crowd I had met, and to every man I stayed all night with, and I found
that it gave the people an interest and confidence in me stronger than I had
ever seen manifested before.

"Though I was considerably fatigued when I reached his house, and, under
ordinary circumstances, should have gone early to bed, I kept him up until
midnight talking about the principles and affairs of government, and got
more real, true knowledge of them than I had got all my life before."

"I have known and seen much of him since, for I respect him - no, that is
not the word - I reverence and love him more than any living man, and I go
to see him two or three times every year; and I will tell you, sir, if every
one who professes to be a Christian lived and acted and enjoyed it as he
does, the religion of Christ would take the world by storm.

"But to return to my story. The next morning we went to the barbecue and, to
my surprise, found about a thousand men there. I met a good many whom I had
not known before, and they and my friend introduced me around until I had
got pretty well acquainted - at least, they all knew me.

"In due time notice was given that I would speak to them. They gathered up
around a stand that had been erected. I opened my speech by saying:

"Fellow-citizens - I present myself before you today feeling like a new man.
My eyes have lately been opened to truths which ignorance or prejudice or
both, had heretofore hidden from my view. I feel that I can today offer you
the ability to render you more valuable service than I have ever been able
to render before. I am here today more for the purpose of acknowledging my
error than to seek your votes. That I should make this acknowledgment is due
to myself as well as to you. Whether you will vote for me is a matter for
your consideration only."

"I went on to tell them about the fire and my vote for the appropriation and
then told them why I was satisfied it was wrong. I closed by saying:

"And now, fellow-citizens, it remains only for me to tell you that the most
of the speech you have listened to with so much interest was simply a
repetition of the arguments by which your neighbor, Mr. Bunce, convinced me
of my error.

"It is the best speech I ever made in my life, but he is entitled to the
credit for it. And now I hope he is satisfied with his convert and that he
will get up here and tell you so.'

"He came up to the stand and said:

"Fellow-citizens - it affords me great pleasure to comply with the request
of Colonel Crockett. I have always considered him a thoroughly honest man,
and I am satisfied that he will faithfully perform all that he has promised
you today.'

"He went down, and there went up from that crowd such a shout for Davy
Crockett as his name never called forth before.'

"I am not much given to tears, but I was taken with a choking then and felt
some big drops rolling down my cheeks. And I tell you now that the
remembrance of those few words spoken by such a man, and the honest, hearty
shout they produced, is worth more to me than all the honors I have received
and all the reputation I have ever made, or ever shall make, as a member of
Congress.'

"Now, sir," concluded Crockett, "you know why I made that speech yesterday.
"There is one thing which I will call your attention, "you remember that I
proposed to give a week's pay. There are in that House many very wealthy men
- men who think nothing of spending a week's pay, or a dozen of them, for a
dinner or a wine party when they have something to accomplish by it. Some of
those same men made beautiful speeches upon the great debt of gratitude
which the country owed the deceased--a debt which could not be paid by
money--and the insignificance and worthlessness of money, particularly so
insignificant a sum as $20,000 when weighed against the honor of the nation.
Yet not one of them responded to my proposition. Money with them is nothing
but trash when it is to come out of the people. But it is the one great
thing for which most of them are striving, and many of them sacrifice honor,
integrity, and justice to obtain it."

***

Col. Crockett later died defending liberty in the Battle of the Alamo, in
the War for Texas Independence.

Tick tock

Well it is that time of year again. Tonight before going to bed we "sprint ahead" and set our clocks back to Daylight Savings Time. This year of course the change come much earlier as the government is once again tinkering with the concept. In my opinion if they were going to make a change it should have been to standardize on one or the other and leave it along. As usual though they didn't bother to ask me. Now if you get up late to morrow you will have only yourself to blame.

For the more important to observe this semi annual ritual this is also a good time to check the batteries in those smoke detectors.

Lets hope this is a "Giant Eagle" snow storm

If you are from the Pittsburgh area you know we have a long history blowing bad weather conditions, especially snow falls, way out of proportion. On top of that in the last several years all of the local television stations, one in particular, have decided that they will make even the possibility of snow falling a ratings event whipping the audience into a frenzy of impending doom.

Anytime there is the hint that we will receive more than two flakes of snow the weather prognosticators are on the air telling you that they will keep you up to date as severe weather moves in. Their counterparts on the anchor desk will speak with reporters in the field showing you that all of the Penn DOT trucks are loaded with salt and ready to hit the road. Then you will get the obligatory shot of lines in the supermarket buying milk and bread.

Meanwhile it has been years since we had a snowfall of enough significances to close down schools and make travel on the roads a real hazard that would keep you sequestered in your home for a day or more. And, it has been decades since we had what I consider a large snowfall. I'm not complaining mind you. I have never had a love for snow even as a kid I much preferred being warm and dry if at all possible. This is just one more way that I don't fit the mold of the typical Western Pennsylvania resident. I really like Pittsburgh but I think snow is something that you should have to take down a book and look at pictures if you wanted to describe it to someone. Lets hope this weekend is just another one of media hype. Every once in a while though I look over my shoulder wondering if this will be the time we wake up to "six inches of partly cloudy" out on the sidewalks. Since I'm in no shape to go out let alone shovel snow I will hope for the former rather than the latter.

Exchange of ideas

I was watching C-Span this afternoon when a meeting this past Wednesday was aired on their "Road To The White House" series. The Black History Month Student Forum was televised from George Town University and Howard Dean, Democratic National Committee Chairman was the moderator.

I am on the opposite side of the political coin from Mr. Dean and find little to agree with him on government policy. He did surprise me though when asked about increasing funds for student volunteer activities and he proposed an alternate plan. He said that he would like to see young people receive a paid collage education in exchange for two years of work for some type of government program like the Peace Corp. I didn't agree completely with this idea but I like the principle of it. I would like to see a program that paid a substantial portion of a persons higher education in exchange for two years of work in their dedicated field. I would give preference to those that teach science and math or have other skills that would further the needs of our country. At one time we had a military draft which created a common bond among many of the male citizens of this country because it was a shared experience. As Newt Gingrich points out "You can't go to France and become a Parisian. You are either born there or you are not. But you can come to America and become an "American" because it is a learned culture." That is one of the things that makes our country unique.

I have mixed feeling on the elimination of the draft and lean more toward the side that it was a good thing that the government no longer presses it citizens into indentured servitude. I would not have a problem with asking young people to do public service in exchange for a helping hand with their education though. I feel that things given away for "free" hold less value for the receiver than things that are earned.


Another idea that he brought up that I thought was excellent was that young people should defer that collage education until they have had some life experience. I don't think it would hurt for high school graduates to spend some time working in the real world, perhaps doing some of that earned volunteer time, which would allow them to mature a little and get a better idea of the field of higher education that they would like to pursue. This of course assumes that we are going to do what is necessary to education system to ensure that graduating students have the skills needed to go on to collage. That is a topic for another discussion though.

My main thought here is that it would be to our great advantage if citizens once again got involved and demanded some results from the elected officials of our country. And that would include listening to ideas from both sides of the political spectrum. The only advantage to the current grid lock is that more bad policies and programs are not being fostered on us.