Around the Town in Oakmont PA

My thoughts and musings on life, technology and living in my adopted home town.

Monday, May 19, 2008

The gospel of Norquist

While watching Book TV recently I found a new hero. One of the authors that had been recorded at a book signing was Grover G. Norquist. I have heard his name mentioned a number of times on C-SPAN, several conservative blogs and web sites but really had never learned anything about him. After hearing him speak about his new book "LEAVE US ALONE" I have become an admirer.

The full title of his book is "Leave Us Alone Getting the Government's Hands Off Our Money, Our Guns, Our Lives" which I think just about says it all.

I have felt for a long time now that we are being treated to a game of "slight of hand" by both the media and most of the politicians in this country. Do we want to tax the rich? Which way should we go about paying for government run health care system? Lets be democratic and let the people decide which government bureaucracy should determine where and how our children are educated. Please watch my right hand closely as it legislates new agencies that we have no real control over as they continue grow in both size and power. I'd rather you not notice that my left hand is picking your pocket with the tax code while gradually taking away some of your fundamental rights under the constitution.

The biggest problem with this game is that "We the people" have gone to sleep and allowed it to proceed. We no longer pay any attention to matters of local, county, state or federal government. Only a small percentage of the qualified population even takes the time to vote and of those that do an even smaller subset of that group casts their vote on the basis of who represents their objectives and values for government policy.

A classic example of this is the fact that most citizens live under the false belief that we live in a democracy. If you read the documents that the founding fathers penned you will find that we are a representative republic. There is a major difference and most of todays students and their parents I might add don't understand the difference.

This brings me back to Mr. Norquist and his book. In it he lays out a plan that forms a coalition of groups that while not agreeing on every item on the laundry list all have at least one item that is their personal "tipping point" for deciding who to vote for. He divides the world up into two such coalitions, the "taking coalition" and the "leave us alone coalition". The taking coalition relies on an every increasing stream of tax revenues to satisify their needs. When that money stream fails to grow or is reduced the coalition members turn on each other as they try to maximize their piece of the pie. On the other hand the leave us alone coalition only wants to see their objective lower taxes, guns, education, privacy or whatever their push button issues is achieved and to be left alone. This might not sound like much but it could be a powerful factor for a number of people.


While I agree with most of the theory I do see some holes in it. I will discuss those in more depth after I have completed reading the book. At this time I'm only about two thirds of the way through it. I will say however that I'm enthusiastic about the book and its concepts. If you have the time I encourage you to stop at your local library or book store and pick it up and judge for yourself.

Mr. Norquist also heads an organization called Americans For Tax Reform whose guiding principal is under no circumstances will we tolerate any additional tax increases. I have provided a link to their site and I encourage you to visit the site and look at what they have to offer in the way of ideas. I think that if my children and grand children are going to have a future some of these ideas are going to have to be implemented.

Labels:

Sunday, May 11, 2008

Road trip!

Linda and I just purchased the second new car in our lifetime. I have never been a fan of buying an item whose value decreases by several thousand dollars the moment you take possession of it. So I make a point to watch for a car that is a few years older that I can buy at a reasonable price. But when I found myself needing a new car I weakened and let Linda talk me into looking at new models. That combined with the fact that our son Dan works for Ford and could get us a very generous employee discount resulted in our buying a new Ford Fusion.




Well I am currently in Virginia Beach as part of Linda's Mother's Day present. She has been toying with embroidery sewing machines for a few years now but has never gotten really "into it" if you know what I mean.

Judy, our daughter in law Sue's mother, on the other hand is well versed in their use and turns out some beautiful work with hers. She just recently upgraded to a newer machine with more bells and whistles and mentioned this to Sue and said that the older model was up for sale. A phone conversation ensued first between Sue and LInda and then between Linda and Judy the result of which is a deal was struck sell Linda the now unused machine. So here we are on vacation to visit with Fred and Judy enjoy their company and the long weekend and pick up this sewing machine that Linda has been drooling over for more than a month now. Under Judy's watchful eye Linda is learning the basics of the machine over the weekend and getting some vital pointers that only come with experience.

Here is Linda's first effort with the machine. This is a shirt that she bought yesterday while we were out shopping and set up on the machine this afternoon. I think she is rather proud of her first effort. I think Linda is going to be very happy with her new hobby and I'm looking forward to having my amateur radio call sign (WA3FKG) embroidered on lots of things. I all ready have ideas for all sorts of neat custom one of a kind projects for the ham shack.

I have enjoyed Fred and Judy's company this weekend and will enjoy the drive home to Oakmont. I'm sure this is not going to be the last "road trip" for the summer unless of course fuel really does make it to five dollars a gallon. Then I will probably be blogging from home rather than on the road.

Labels:

Wednesday, April 09, 2008

Humor?

This was written as humor but to me it has a ring of truth to it. See if you agree.


Today's Press

A man is walking by the Berkley, California Zoo when he sees a little girl
leaning into the lion's cage. Suddenly, the lion grabs her by the cuff
of her jacket and tries to pull her inside to devour her right in front of
the little girl's screaming parents.

The man runs to the cage, hits the lion square on the nose with a powerful
punch. Whimpering from the pain, the lion jumps back letting go of the
girl, and the man brings her to her terrified parents, who thank him
endlessly.

A reporter has seen the whole scene, and addressing the man, says: "Sir,
this was the most gallant and brave thing I saw a man do in my whole
life."
"Why, it was nothing," said the man; "really, the lion was behind bars
and I knew God would protect me just as He did Daniel in the lions den long,
long ago. I just saw this little kid in danger and acted as I felt was
right."

"I noticed a bible in your pocket," said the journalist.

"Yes, I'm a Christian and was on my way to a bible study," the man
replied.


"Well, I'll make sure this won't go unnoticed. I'm a journalist, you
know, and tomorrow's paper will have this on the front page."

The journalist leaves. The following morning the man buys the paper to
see if it indeed brings news of his actions, and reads, on the first page:

"Right Wing Christian Fundamentalist Assaults African Immigrant and Steals
His lunch."

Thursday, April 03, 2008

Take a peek at Rt. 28 construction

This link will bring up camera pictures only of Rt28 near construction zone between Harmarvile & RIDC in real time.

For updates you will need to manually click on "Refresh" button on your web browser window. Just look at the time at the top of the picture and see if it changes after you click "Refresh". New pictures are available about every 45-60+ seconds.


Camera View of Rt 28 Construction



Wednesday, April 02, 2008

A bit of humor to start your day


Well, Girl Potato and Boy Potato had eyes for each other, and finally they got married, and had a little girl sweet potato, which they called 'Yam.'

Of course, they wanted the best for Yam.

When it was time, they told her about the facts of life.

They warned her about going out
and getting half-baked, so she wouldn't get accidentally mashed, and get a bad name for herself like 'Hot Potato,' and end up with a bunch of Tater Tots

Yam said not to worry. No Spud would get her into the sack and make a rotten potato out of her!

But on the other hand, she wouldn't stay home and become a Couch Potato, either.

She would get plenty of exercise so as not to be skinny like her Shoestring cousins.

When she went off to Europe, Mr. and Mrs. Potato told Yam to watch out for the hard-boiled guys from Ireland

And the greasy guys from France called the French Fries. And when she went out west, to watch out for the Indians so she wouldn't get scalloped.

Yam said she would stay on the straight and narrow and wouldn't associate with those high class Yukon Golds, or the ones from the other side of the tracks who advertise their trade on all the trucks that say, 'Frito Lay.'

Mr. and Mrs. Potato sent Yam to Idaho P.U. (that's Potato University ), so that when she graduated, she'd really be in the Chips.

But, in spite of all they did for her, one day Yam came home and announced she was going to marry Tom Brokaw.

Tom Brokaw!

Mr. and Mrs. Potato were very upset.

They told Yam she couldn't possibly marry Tom Brokaw because he's just......

Are you ready for this?
*
*

Are you sure?

*
*

OK! Here it is!

*
*
*
*


A COMMONTATER

Labels:

Saturday, March 15, 2008

Not yours to give...............

This was sent to me by a friend who long ago left the Pittsburgh area because the taxes and the business climate made finding employment much easier in other parts of the United States. With todays short attention spans this is a rather long read but I think it is well worth the effort. I also happen to think that it applies just as much today as it did when it was written. See if you agree.



------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally published in "The Life of Colonel David Crockett," compiled by
Edward Sylvester Ellis (Philadelphia: Porter & Coates, 1884).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Not Yours To Give"
Col. David Crockett
US Representative from Tennessee (1827-1831, 1832-1835)

One day in the House of Representatives a bill was taken up appropriating
money for the benefit of a widow of a distinguished naval officer. Several
beautiful speeches had been made in its support. The speaker was just about
to put the question when Crockett arose:

"Mr. Speaker--I have as much respect for the memory of the deceased, and as
much sympathy for the suffering of the living, if there be, as any man in
this House, but we must not permit our respect for the dead or our sympathy
for part of the living to lead us into an act of injustice to the balance of
the living. I will not go into an argument to prove that Congress has not
the power to appropriate this money as an act of charity. Every member on
this floor knows it.

We have the right as individuals, to give away as much of our own money as
we please in charity; but as members of Congress we have no right to
appropriate a dollar of the public money. Some eloquent appeals have been
made to us upon the ground that it is a debt due the deceased. Mr. Speaker,
the deceased lived long after the close of the war; he was in office to the
day of his death, and I ever heard that the government was in arrears to
him.

"Every man in this House knows it is not a debt. We cannot without the
grossest corruption, appropriate this money as the payment of a debt. We
have not the semblance of authority to appropriate it as charity. Mr.
Speaker, I have said we have the right to give as much money of our own as
we please. I am the poorest man on this floor. I cannot vote for this bill,
but I will give one week's pay to the object, and if every member of
Congress will do the same, it will amount to more than the bill asks."

He took his seat. Nobody replied. The bill was put upon its passage, and,
instead of passing unanimously, as was generally supposed, and as, no doubt,
it would, but for that speech, it received but few votes, and, of course,
was lost.

Later, when asked by a friend why he had opposed the appropriation, Crockett
gave this explanation:

"Several years ago I was one evening standing on the steps of the Capitol
with some members of Congress, when our attention was attracted by a great
light over in Georgetown. It was evidently a large fire. We jumped into a
hack and drove over as fast as we could. In spite of all that could be done,
many houses were burned and many families made houseless, and besides, some
of them had lost all but the clothes they had on. The weather was very cold,
and when I saw so many children suffering, I felt that something ought to be
done for them. The next morning a bill was introduced appropriating $20,000
for their relief. We put aside all other business and rushed it through as
soon as it could be done.

"The next summer, when it began to be time to think about election, I
concluded I would take a scout around among the boys of my district. I had
no opposition there but, as the election was some time off, I did not know
what might turn up. When riding one day in a part of my district in which I
was more of a stranger than any other, I saw a man in a field plowing and
coming toward the road. I gauged my gait so that we should meet as he came
up, I spoke to the man. He replied politely, but as I thought, rather
coldly.

"I began: 'Well friend, I am one of those unfortunate beings called
candidates and---

"Yes I know you; you are Colonel Crockett. I have seen you once before, and
voted for you the last time you were elected. I suppose you are out
electioneering now, but you had better not waste your time or mine, I shall
not vote for you again."

"This was a sockdolger...I begged him tell me what was the matter.

"Well Colonel, it is hardly worthwhile to waste time or words upon it. I do
not see how it can be mended, but you gave a vote last winter which shows
that either you have not capacity to understand the Constitution, or that
you are wanting in the honesty and firmness to be guided by it. In either
case you are not the man to represent me. But I beg your pardon for
expressing it that way. I did not intend to avail myself of the privilege of
the constituent to speak plainly to a candidate for the purpose of insulting
you or wounding you.'

"I intend by it only to say that your understanding of the constitution is
very different from mine; and I will say to you what but for my rudeness, I
should not have said, that I believe you to be honest.

But an understanding of the constitution different from mine I cannot
overlook, because the Constitution, to be worth anything, must be held
sacred, and rigidly observed in all its provisions. The man who wields power
and misinterprets it is the more dangerous the honest he is.'

"'I admit the truth of all you say, but there must be some mistake. Though I
live in the backwoods and seldom go from home, I take the papers from
Washington and read very carefully all the proceedings of Congress. My
papers say you voted for a bill to appropriate $20,000 to some sufferers by
fire in Georgetown. Is that true?

"Well my friend; I may as well own up. You have got me there. But certainly
nobody will complain that a great and rich country like ours should give the
insignificant sum of $20,000 to relieve its suffering women and children,
particularly with a full and overflowing treasury, and I am sure, if you had
been there, you would have done just the same as I did.'

"It is not the amount, Colonel, that I complain of; it is the principle. In
the first place, the government ought to have in the Treasury no more than
enough for its legitimate purposes. But that has nothing with the question.
The power of collecting and disbursing money at pleasure is the most
dangerous power that can be entrusted to man, particularly under our system
of collecting revenue by a tariff, which reaches every man in the country,
no matter how poor he may be, and the poorer he is the more he pays in
proportion to his means.

What is worse, it presses upon him without his knowledge where the weight
centers, for there is not a man in the United States who can ever guess how
much he pays to the government. So you see, that while you are contributing
to relieve one, you are drawing it from thousands who are even worse off
than he.

If you had the right to give anything, the amount was simply a matter of
discretion with you, and you had as much right to give $20,000,000 as
$20,000. If you have the right to give at all; and as the Constitution
neither defines charity nor stipulates the amount, you are at liberty to
give to any and everything which you may believe, or profess to believe, is
a charity and to any amount you may think proper. You will very easily
perceive what a wide door this would open for fraud and corruption and
favoritism, on the one hand, and for robbing the people on the other. 'No,
Colonel, Congress has no right to give charity.'

"'Individual members may give as much of their own money as they please, but
they have no right to touch a dollar of the public money for that purpose.
If twice as many houses had been burned in this country as in Georgetown,
neither you nor any other member of Congress would have Thought of
appropriating a dollar for our relief. There are about two hundred and forty
members of Congress. If they had shown their sympathy for the sufferers by
contributing each one week's pay, it would have made over $13,000. There are
plenty of wealthy men around Washington who could have given $20,000 without
depriving themselves of even a luxury of life.'

"The congressmen chose to keep their own money, which, if reports be true,
some of them spend not very creditably; and the people about Washington, no
doubt, applauded you for relieving them from necessity of giving what was
not yours to give. The people have delegated to Congress, by the
Constitution, the power to do certain things. To do these, it is authorized
to collect and pay moneys, and for nothing else. Everything beyond this is
usurpation, and a violation of the Constitution.'

"'So you see, Colonel, you have violated the Constitution in what I consider
a vital point. It is a precedent fraught with danger to the country, for
when Congress once begins to stretch its power beyond the limits of the
Constitution, there is no limit to it, and no security for the people. I
have no doubt you acted honestly, but that does not make it any better,
except as far as you are personally concerned, and you see that I cannot
vote for you.'

"I tell you I felt streaked. I saw if I should have opposition, and this man
should go to talking and in that district I was a gone fawn-skin. I could
not answer him, and the fact is, I was so fully convinced that he was right,
I did not want to. But I must satisfy him, and I said to him:

"Well, my friend, you hit the nail upon the head when you said I had not
sense enough to understand the Constitution. I intended to be guided by it,
and thought I had studied it fully. I have heard many speeches in Congress
about the powers of Congress, but what you have said here at your plow has
got more hard, sound sense in it than all the fine speeches I ever heard. If
I had ever taken the view of it that you have, I would have put my head into
the fire before I would have given that vote; and if you will forgive me and
vote for me again, if I ever vote for another unconstitutional law I wish I
may be shot.'

"He laughingly replied; 'Yes, Colonel, you have sworn to that once before,
but I will trust you again upon one condition. You are convinced that your
vote was wrong. Your acknowledgment of it will do more good than beating you
for it. If, as you go around the district, you will tell people about this
vote, and that you are satisfied it was wrong, I will not only vote for you,
but will do what I can to keep down opposition, and perhaps, I may exert
some little influence in that way.'

"If I don't, said I, 'I wish I may be shot; and to convince you that I am in
earnest in what I say I will come back this way in a week or ten days, and
if you will get up a gathering of people, I will make a speech to them. Get
up a barbecue, and I will pay for it.'

"No, Colonel, we are not rich people in this section but we have plenty of
provisions to contribute for a barbecue, and some to spare for those who
have none. The push of crops will be over in a few days, and we can then
afford a day for a barbecue. 'This Thursday; I will see to getting it up on
Saturday week. Come to my house on Friday, and we will go together, and I
promise you a very respectable crowd to see and hear you.

"'Well I will be here. But one thing more before I say good-bye. I must know
your name."

"'My name is Bunce.'

"'Not Horatio Bunce?'

"'Yes

"'Well, Mr. Bunce, I never saw you before, though you say you have seen me,
but I know you very well. I am glad I have met you, and very proud that I
may hope to have you for my friend.'

"It was one of the luckiest hits of my life that I met him. He mingled but
little with the public, but was widely known for his remarkable
intelligence, and for a heart brim-full and running over with kindness and
benevolence, which showed themselves not only in words but in acts. He was
the oracle of the whole country around him, and his fame had extended far
beyond the circle of his immediate acquaintance. Though I had never met him,
before, I had heard much of him, and but for this meeting it is very likely
I should have had opposition, and had been beaten. One thing is very
certain, no man could now stand up in that district under such a vote.

"At the appointed time I was at his house, having told our conversation to
every crowd I had met, and to every man I stayed all night with, and I found
that it gave the people an interest and confidence in me stronger than I had
ever seen manifested before.

"Though I was considerably fatigued when I reached his house, and, under
ordinary circumstances, should have gone early to bed, I kept him up until
midnight talking about the principles and affairs of government, and got
more real, true knowledge of them than I had got all my life before."

"I have known and seen much of him since, for I respect him - no, that is
not the word - I reverence and love him more than any living man, and I go
to see him two or three times every year; and I will tell you, sir, if every
one who professes to be a Christian lived and acted and enjoyed it as he
does, the religion of Christ would take the world by storm.

"But to return to my story. The next morning we went to the barbecue and, to
my surprise, found about a thousand men there. I met a good many whom I had
not known before, and they and my friend introduced me around until I had
got pretty well acquainted - at least, they all knew me.

"In due time notice was given that I would speak to them. They gathered up
around a stand that had been erected. I opened my speech by saying:

"Fellow-citizens - I present myself before you today feeling like a new man.
My eyes have lately been opened to truths which ignorance or prejudice or
both, had heretofore hidden from my view. I feel that I can today offer you
the ability to render you more valuable service than I have ever been able
to render before. I am here today more for the purpose of acknowledging my
error than to seek your votes. That I should make this acknowledgment is due
to myself as well as to you. Whether you will vote for me is a matter for
your consideration only."

"I went on to tell them about the fire and my vote for the appropriation and
then told them why I was satisfied it was wrong. I closed by saying:

"And now, fellow-citizens, it remains only for me to tell you that the most
of the speech you have listened to with so much interest was simply a
repetition of the arguments by which your neighbor, Mr. Bunce, convinced me
of my error.

"It is the best speech I ever made in my life, but he is entitled to the
credit for it. And now I hope he is satisfied with his convert and that he
will get up here and tell you so.'

"He came up to the stand and said:

"Fellow-citizens - it affords me great pleasure to comply with the request
of Colonel Crockett. I have always considered him a thoroughly honest man,
and I am satisfied that he will faithfully perform all that he has promised
you today.'

"He went down, and there went up from that crowd such a shout for Davy
Crockett as his name never called forth before.'

"I am not much given to tears, but I was taken with a choking then and felt
some big drops rolling down my cheeks. And I tell you now that the
remembrance of those few words spoken by such a man, and the honest, hearty
shout they produced, is worth more to me than all the honors I have received
and all the reputation I have ever made, or ever shall make, as a member of
Congress.'

"Now, sir," concluded Crockett, "you know why I made that speech yesterday.
"There is one thing which I will call your attention, "you remember that I
proposed to give a week's pay. There are in that House many very wealthy men
- men who think nothing of spending a week's pay, or a dozen of them, for a
dinner or a wine party when they have something to accomplish by it. Some of
those same men made beautiful speeches upon the great debt of gratitude
which the country owed the deceased--a debt which could not be paid by
money--and the insignificance and worthlessness of money, particularly so
insignificant a sum as $20,000 when weighed against the honor of the nation.
Yet not one of them responded to my proposition. Money with them is nothing
but trash when it is to come out of the people. But it is the one great
thing for which most of them are striving, and many of them sacrifice honor,
integrity, and justice to obtain it."

***

Col. Crockett later died defending liberty in the Battle of the Alamo, in
the War for Texas Independence.


Saturday, March 08, 2008

Tick tock


Well it is that time of year again. Tonight before going to bed we "sprint ahead" and set our clocks back to Daylight Savings Time. This year of course the change come much earlier as the government is once again tinkering with the concept. In my opinion if they were going to make a change it should have been to standardize on one or the other and leave it along. As usual though they didn't bother to ask me. Now if you get up late to morrow you will have only yourself to blame.

For the more important to observe this semi annual ritual this is also a good time to check the batteries in those smoke detectors.